UTSOAThe University of Texas at Austin School of Architecture

fall 2006

ARC 520M:
Design 5: CiNEMARCHITECTURE

Instructor:
Nik Nikolov

Truth is 24 times a second!
Jean-Luc Godard

Film is an allied art to architecture: the two disciplines are complexly related. The settings for film are within the space posited by architecture. By the very nature of film, these spaces are synthetic. They are 'fabricated' out of the multitude of vignettes provided by architecture within the world (and within imagination). Film is able to manipulate, recompose, and juxtapose these spaces/settings almost at will. The viewer is held 'captive' to the direction of the view to the sequence and to the frame. Architecture, by contrast, seems to be somewhat held captive to the 'whims' of the participant. In their architectural interdependency film's heroes and sets investigate issues of ARCHITECTURE and CiNEMA.

We will draw on the assumption that scenarios (cinematic scripts) are implicit in every piece of architecture. At the same time all narratives are architecturally dependent; that in order to understand stories we need to construct their architecture and at the same time, in order to understand architecture we need to place a story in it, thus reaffirming the belief that program (script) is an important determinant of architectural form. Architecture has much to learn from the brief historical record of film for the many ways that film 'manages' the built environment.

scene from 8 1/2

8 1/2 (1962) : Federico Fellini director, Marcello Mastroianni actor

The special program being attended to is the program of FILM in general, and the program of CINEMA - a place for showing film - in particular. Including all the issues raised when thinking about ARCHITECTURE and CiNEMA, you are asked quite simply to arrive at designs which provide for the showing of film. Our MODERN CINEMA attempts to look at the apparatus free from the constraints of the economy, and free from the constraints of the stereotype.

DESIGN FIVE

DESIGN FIVE (D5) is an intermediate-level design studio with an emphasis on theory and research. The D5 studio challenges each student to develop clear working methodologies, formulate a design thesis or hypothesis, and test intention through iterative making. Each student will generate a body of work resulting from a fifteen week interrogation. The content of the work is spatial, experiential, temporal, and structural. D5 will open up the potential for architectural invention.

D5 includes a studio component and a seminar component. The seminar is topic-based, and introduced with a question and working methodologies. The studio supports the topic and theoretical content of the seminar. The seminar sessions will be held every Friday 1-3pm at SUT 2.110. Prior to the class, namely by 8am on Fridays, all students will be required to post comments and questions on the course's electronic reserves site. This site is accessed through the University of Texas at Austin Libraries link or at reserves.lib.utexas.edu/eres/

The required reading for this studio is available in the Readings in CiNEMARCHITECTURE packet and will be available for purchase at Speedway Copying & Printing at Dobie Mall.

In addition to the required list of readings and their in-class discussion, an important ingredient of our designs will be multitudes of additional readings and discussions, as well as film screenings and research, all of which will accompany our studio endeavors and provide the supplementary source material for program development.

A collective place to keep reference material for the class (books, compendiums, and other reference material), the accumulated Studio Library, will provide a "set of instructions" on how our cinemas are organized spatially and give form to building spaces in terms of the variety of actions and interactions that take place within it.

The studio, through the project of the CiNEMA, will immerse itself in the city - at first through the exercise of 'spatial stories', secondly through the intervention of the composition of the cinema within a selected site within Austin.

Finally, the studio carries with it a belief that the production of architecture benefits from the involvement of the "non-singular author/participant". The working teams formed within the studio will allow the work to be born from dialogue, not monologue, to be produced from multiple, not singular efforts, and to be physically crafted from many hands and eyes instead of two.

The instructor (plus guests) looks forward to a productive semester, and to the collaborative inquiry of issues raised by CiNEMARCHITECTURE.

DESIGN 5 COURSE POLICIES

Attendance Policy

Studio meets MW 1:00 - 6:00, F3:00 - 6:00
Seminar meets F 1:00 - 3:00
Attendance is mandatory. Participation in both studio and seminar is expected. Students with two unexcused absences may be dropped from the course without further notice. The minimum penalty for two unexcused absences is a full grade letter drop in your final grade for the course. Please contact me prior to the beginning of class if you expect to be late or will not be attending class.

Absences are excused only for medical conditions and personal or family emergencies. I may require written documentation for any excused absence.

A student who is absent from a class or examination for the observance of a religious holy day may complete the work missed within a reasonable time after the absence, if proper notice has been given. Notice must be given at least fourteen days prior to the classes scheduled on dates the student will be absent. For religious holy days that fall within the first two weeks of the semester, notice should be given on the first day of the semester. It must be personally delivered to the instructor and signed and dated by the instructor, or sent certified mail, return receipt requested. A student who fails to complete missed work within the time allowed will be subject to the normal academic penalties.

Grading

This is a research studio. Design work is iterative. You are responsible for generating a well articulated thesis or hypothesis and body of work which tests your intentions. This body of work must be informed by both studio making and seminar thinking. Your studio and seminar work is evaluated on its rigor and evolution over sixteen weeks. Equal weight is given to all assignments.

Grading is broken into four components for each assignment:

1/4 theory/research: your identification of pertinent concepts and discussions through seminar participation and studio translation

1/4 thesis: your intention combined with an appropriate translation into making.

1/4 product: the testing of your thesis through actual physical samples and prototypes

1/4 synthesis: the understanding of thesis and product and their architectural implications

Grading criteria:

The criteria for establishing a grade is as follows:

A (90-100%) OUTSTANDING DESIGN 5 WORK
The resulting body of work is decisively iterative, tested and exemplary in its theory/research, thesis, product and synthesis. It is innovative and supported by a well articulated intention. Research methodologies have matured at a rigorous pace, evidencing a pursuit fueled by thinking and making. All work is completed on time and is done so prolifically. Work at this level surpasses expectations with respect to development, inventiveness, impact, appropriateness, resolution and integrity of pursuit.

B (80-89%) GOOD DESIGN 5 WORK
The resulting body of work is iterative, tested and evidences experimentation with research methodologies. It is supported by a well articulated intention. Work which earns the grade of B is not deserving of the grade A because it does not coherently and rigorously follow through on one of the following: theory/research, thesis, product and synthesis. Work at this level is diligently pursued and completed on time. It is likewise inventive, developed, promises impact and evidences a dedicated pursuit.

C (70-79%) AVERAGE DESIGN 5 WORK
The resulting body of work is iterative and tested but underdeveloped with regards to research methodologies. A thesis and intention are present but under-articulated. Work which earns the grade of C is not deserving of a Grade A or B because it lacks development and coherency in two or more of the following areas: theory/research, thesis, product and synthesis. Work at this level is moderately rigorous, completed on time but lacks invention and complete dedication. A brilliant idea can earn a grade of C if it produces a casual product and a thinly articulated thesis. Similarly, a weak or indifferently pursued idea can earn a grade of C even if it is accompanied by a good end result.

D (60-69%) DESIGN 5 WORK IS NOT EVIDENT
The resulting body of work is not iteratively pursued and is underdeveloped with regards to research methodologies. The intention of the work is not present or easily identified. Work which earns a grade of D is not deserving of a Grade A, B or C because it lacks development and coherency in three or more of the following areas: theory/research, thesis, product and synthesis. Work is not completed on time, is thoroughly underdeveloped and missing whole and essential concepts developed in the studio.

F (below 59%) DESIGN 5 WORK IS ABANDONED
A body of work is not present or evident. Work which earns a grade of F lacks development and coherency in all of the following areas: theory/research, thesis, product and synthesis.

X Excused incomplete
In accordance with university policy, an X or incomplete may be given only for legitimate reasons of illness or family emergency. Simply not completing the work on time is not an adequate cause for assigning this symbol. It may only be used after consultation with the instructor or the Associate Dean, and with an agreement as to a new completion date. Studio work has to be completed before the second week of the next design semester in which a student wishes to enroll, according to school policy.

If you are earning a C, D, or F at mid semester I may issue an absence/failing report.

Students with disabilities:

The University of Texas at Austin provides upon request appropriate academic accommodations for qualified students with disabilities. For more information, contact the Office of the Dean of Students at 471-6259, 471-4641.

If you are appropriately qualified through this office, please notify me in accordance with the Office of the Dean of Students policies.

Studio Safety and Security

The studio should be an environment for anyone and everyone to feel comfortable in. Please see me if there are any problems (music, visual pollution, etc.) that you are unable to resolve on your own. Security is a necessary component for a studio that is accessible to you and your colleagues 24 hours a day, 7 days a week. After hours please keep doors to the studio and especially the building locked. Do not prop open building doors and remove those props that you do find. Be safe.