spring 2007
ARI 520L:
Interior Design IV
Instructor:
Gerlinde Leiding
The primary objective for this course is to explore linkages between multiple interior spaces and the study of spatial thresholds.
The semester's work consists of four projects with the definition of BAU/AUSBAU (building/finish), CONTEXT and SCALE as the fundamental issue for all.
These exercises are meant to establish skills of interior design in: (1) concept formation; (2) spatial definition; (3) programmatic expression; and (4) finish representation in drawing and model format.
Project 1: Door
deals with the definition of threshold between the public and private realm
Project 2: Entry
deals with the linkage of object, path, and space
Project 3: Floor
deals with the configuration of the path, differentiating space, and form-defining space
Project 4: Salon
deals with spatial qualities, articulation of form with the wall, and light as territorial delineators
Projects 1 and 2 are generic in loco, while Project 3 uses a specified location.
International references, precedents, select writings, exercises, and products addressing BAU/AUSBAU will serve as theoretical stimuli for lectures and discussions. Topics include Technological, Sociological and Humanistic Design concerns and factors pertaining to Ideology, Form, Experience
.Basis of Evaluation: Grading Criteria
Establishing grades for projects of a creative nature is a more complex matter than grading in other academic areas. While each project contains certain quantifiable elements by which it may be evaluated, a significant portion of each grade is derived from a broader, more subjective set of issues. The criteria for establishing a grade for each project are, as follows:
A (90-100%) Outstanding Work
Project must be complete at all levels-i.e., concept, process, product. Each of these levels must surpass expectations for Design II work in terms of inventiveness, appropriateness, graphic ability, and personal advancement.
B (80-90%) Good Work
Project must be complete at all levels. Each level is done thoroughly, is well researched and is diligently pursued. This is the expected performance for Design II work.
C (70-79%) Average Work
Not all levels (concept, process, product) are developed equally. For example, a brilliant concept and a casual product, or a weak idea, an indifferent development and a good end result will get a C grade.
D (60-69%) Not Very Good Work
Not all levels are present, some of the requested components of the project are missing. Either care and attention are missing or basic skills in graphics, logic, and concentration are not developed enough for Design II level.
F (below 59%) Unaccepted Work
Note that this grade will be assigned when you have missed an extended amount of class time (over one week) without notifying the School of Architecture, (512) 471-1922, as to your situation.
X (excused incomplete)
Can be given only for legitimate reasons of illness or family emergency. Simply not completing the work on time is not an adequate cause for assigning this symbol. It may only be used after consultation with the instructor or the Assistant Dean, and with an agreement as to a new completion date. Studio work has to be completed before the second week of the next design semester in which you wish to enroll, according to School policy. Other items that may effect grades and are at the discretion of each individual instructor include:
Attendance in the studio and at reviews, and
Acceptance of late work and penalties for same.
Attendance
Punctual and regular attendance is essential, and students are expected to work on projects in the studio. Students with three unexcused absences during the term, or two consecutive unexcused absences, may be dropped from the course without further notice.